Patient newsletter: 2019

by | Jun 21, 2019 | Patient newsletters | 0 comments

This newsletter is also available in a full-colour, printable PDF format: Download the Patient Newsletter 2019 (PDF)

Purpose of BADBIR

BADBIR was established to assess the long term safety of newer drugs by following a real world population of psoriasis patients i.e. people of different ages, races and medical histories from all areas of the U.K. and Republic of Ireland.

Drugs have been carefully tested for safety in clinical trials. However these trials are:

  • Run for a relatively short period of time
  • Have limited numbers of participants
  • May exclude patients with additional diseases (co-morbidities)

A big Thank You to all participants!

We begin 2019 with 161 participating centres across the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland and over 17,427 registrations.

We invite researchers and patients to follow @BADBIR

What’s New?

  • Study design updates (Page 2)
  • New drugs on board (Page 2)
  • Research papers (Pages 3 & 4)

Study Consent

BADBIR is now monitoring an additional group of drugs named the small molecule group. The study will compare the rates of safety events within each group.

Data collected on:

  • Comorbidities
  • Drug details
  • Safety events
  • Psoriasis severity
  • Patient Reported Measures
  • Lifestyle
  • Cancers
  • Deaths
  • Inpatient hospital admissions

Collection timeline: Annual registration, 6 monthly clinical and patient follow-up during years 1 and 3, and lifelong linkage services.

Your identifiable information will not be shared with anyone, aside from the linkage services referenced in the latest version (V5) of the information sheet and consent form. We share information with national providers of healthcare data so that the BADBIR study can receive information about your health that may not have been collected via your clinical follow-up. These organisations provide data services covering any hospital admissions you have had, cancer details if you have been diagnosed with cancer and in the event of patient death we receive the causes of death. For participants who consented using a version prior to 5, an application was made to the national Confidentiality Advisory Group to approve this data linkage. Further details can be found on our website at www.badbir.org/participants.

Patients receiving therapies

Small Molecule Group

Patients receiving a small molecule therapy

Biologic Group

Patients receiving a biologic therapy

Control Group

Patients receiving a systemic therapy

COMPARE

  • Small Molecule Group: Otezla, Skilarence*
  • Biologic Group: Benepali, Cosentyx, Cimzia*, Erelzi*, Humira, Hyrimoz*, Kyntheum*, Stelara, Taltz, Zessly*
  • Control Group: Acitretin, Ciclosporin, Fumaric acid esters, Hydroxycarbamide, Methotrexate, Oral PUVA

* New drugs accepted on BADBIR

Research Update

2017/8 Research Paper Summaries

1. Risk of Serious Infection in Patients with Psoriasis Receiving Biologics

Results

  • Patients receiving Humira, Enbrel and Stelara did not have a significantly higher risk of serious infections as compared to patients receiving conventional systemic drugs.
  • There was no difference in the risk of serious infections between Humira, Enbrel and Stelara.

2. Drug Survival of Second-Line Biologic Therapies in Patients with Psoriasis

Results

  • 77% of patients who were switched to a second biologic continued on the new treatment for at least 12 months. This dropped to 58% of patients continuing treatment in year 3.
  • Stelara had the highest drug survival rate over 3 years of treatment.
  • Second-line discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) was more common among those who discontinued first-line treatment due to AEs.

Purpose
Drug survival, defined by the length of time a patient stays on a drug, is an indicator of how effective a drug continues to be over time and/or whether a drug is stopped because of a side effect etc. If the first biologic used to treat the patient (first-line therapy) is not effective or the patient experiences side effects their dermatologist may start them on a different biologic. This is known as a second-line biologic therapy. This study was carried to find out how successful second-line biologics are for patients.

3. Intentional and Unintentional Medication Non-Adherence in Psoriasis

Results

  • 22.4% of patients using self-administered systemic therapies are classified as non-adherent.
  • Patients using an oral conventional systemic agent were more likely to be non-adherent compared to those using Enbrel or Humira.
  • The risk factors associated with non-adherence were strong medication beliefs i.e. the patient having strong medication concerns and poor habit strength; a weaker routine of taking their medication.

Purpose
Medication non-adherence can be intentional, where patients make a deliberate decision not to follow the prescribed medication schedule, or unintentional such as forgetting to take the medication. It is important to understand why patients do not adhere to drugs in order to identify the risk factors of non-adherence. This study was carried out to find out if such risk factors can be targeted in order to improve treatment effectiveness.

Conclusion

  • The risk of serious infection should not be a primary concern for patients and clinicians when deciding between these treatment options.
  • Patients experiencing treatment failure with one biologic therapy can benefit from switching to another biologic.
  • Medication beliefs and habit strength can be targeted to develop strategies that can improve adherence in psoriasis.

Research Update Continued

4. Generating EQ-5D-3L Utility Scores from the DLQI

Purpose
The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is the most widely used questionnaire to assess quality of life related to skin disease in psoriasis studies. However it is not relevant to other diseases and therefore when comparisons are required the information collected is not transferable. The EQ-5D-3L questionnaire is used to assess quality of life across all diseases and in healthy individuals. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) includes EQ-5D-3L as part of the standardised assessment when making a decision on whether a drug should be made available to patients on the NHS. This study was carried out to determine if information collected using the DLQI can be used by researchers to predict a EQ-5D-3L score.

Results

  • The results of this study demonstrated that it was possible to reasonably predict EQ-5D-3L utility scores from the DLQI data. A user-friendly freely accessible tool has been produced to enable analysts to use this system.

Conclusion
Although it remains preferable to use scores derived directly from the EQ-5D-3L, this system can be used to generate utility estimates in future evaluations of treatment for patients with psoriasis.

5. Comparison of Drug Discontinuation, Effectiveness and Safety Between Clinical Trial Eligible and Ineligible Patients in BADBIR

Purpose
Patients with psoriasis enrolled in clinical trials of biologics may not be similar to those treated in dermatology clinic. This could mean that results achieved in clinical trials e.g. safety and efficacy may be different when drugs are used in the “real world”. There is evidence that patients who would not meet the entry criteria for such trials (ineligible) have a greater risk of serious adverse events (SAEs), but the effect on drug discontinuation and effectiveness are unknown.

Results

  • Psoriasis patients receiving biologic therapy who were identified as ineligible for clinical trials were twice as likely to experience a serious adverse event (SAE) when compared with eligible patients in the first 12 months of treatment.
  • These same ineligible patients had significantly lower levels of improvement in their psoriasis when compared with eligible patients in the first 12 months of treatment (Humira, Enbrel and Stelara).
  • There were no differences in overall discontinuation rates between eligible and ineligible categories for any of the biologics investigated.

Conclusion
Psoriasis patients enrolled in clinical trials on biologics are not entirely representative of real-world patients. Dermatologists should be mindful of these differences when counselling patients on biologic treatment.

6. Cumulative Exposure to Biologics and Risk of Cancer in Psoriasis Patients: Psonet studies from Israel, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland

Purpose
In theory, there may be an increased risk of cancer following long‐term exposure to biologic therapies in patients with psoriasis. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between total length of exposure to biologic therapy and risk of cancer.

Results

  • Psonet comprises independent drug safety registries that collaborate to investigate the long-term safety and effectiveness of biologic and systemic therapies in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.
  • In this study the total length of exposure to biologics was found not to be associated with the risk of developing cancers, even after considering the effect of age, gender, location, previous exposure to methotrexate, ciclosporin and phototherapy, duration of psoriasis, and other medical conditions.

Conclusion
Total length of exposure to biologic therapies in psoriasis patients treated in real‐world clinical practice does not appear to be linked to a higher risk of cancer after several years of use.

0 Comments

Recent Comments